Is ChatGPT Tricking Coders? New Research Reveals Surprising Results
2 min readChatGPT, the popular AI-based coding tool that has been helping coders write code more efficiently and quickly, has been under much scrutiny lately. New research has revealed some surprising results that may make you think twice about using it.
The research, conducted by a team of computer scientists, focused on the accuracy of the code produced by ChatGPT. They found that the tool was able to generate code that was approximately 95% accurate, but it had a few major shortcomings. Firstly, the code was often overly verbose and inefficient. Secondly, the code produced by ChatGPT was often not as well-structured as code written by humans.
The team also looked at the speed of the code produced by ChatGPT. They found that it was often not as fast as code written by humans. In some cases, the tool was even slower. This could be due to the fact that it was not designed to optimize for speed, but rather for accuracy.
The most alarming finding of the research was that the code produced by ChatGPT often contained errors that human coders would not make. This means that the tool could be introducing bugs into the code that could cause serious problems later down the line.
So is ChatGPT really tricking coders? It certainly seems like it. The research suggests that the tool is not as accurate or efficient as code written by humans. It’s also introducing potential bugs into the code. It’s important to keep these findings in mind when considering whether or not to use the tool.
It should be noted, however, that the research was limited in scope and that more research needs to be done to fully understand the potential risks and benefits of using ChatGPT. For now, it’s best to use the tool with caution. It’s also important to remember that the tool can be a great resource for coders who want to quickly and accurately write code. Just be sure to double-check the code for accuracy and make sure you’re aware of any potential bugs that could be introduced.
Source: ucodes.me